Medical malpractice is a legal term for the poor quality, faulty or negligent medical care by a qualified medical professional used to cause injury to the patient. Recently, cases such as those involving medical mismanagement on the rise due to the increased patient awareness and government legislation.
Case Study
Leon Baker suffered a heart attack after his doctors administered the wrong medication during the operation. He put his medical complaintNegligence, in the award of £ 200,000 held in cash. However, not all claims that these violent compensation. In fact, the rate of medical malpractice claims is much lower than for road or work accidents. This is because in most cases, patients do not understand the complex procedures involved in filing such a claim.
Criticism
The Personal Injury Valuation Handbook estimates that one fifth of medicalNegligence claims involve death. However, no statistics do not show the actual cost to the patient and his family. Medical negligence not only causes irreparable physical harm to the patient, but also leaves permanent psychological scars. In addition, the process of registration of a claim is time-consuming and complex. Nevertheless, some claim against the same laws that protect against an incorrect treatment. Here are some of the arguments:
• "Medical malpractice laws to increase litigationand encourage fraudulent claims. "That's not true. Research shows that the risk of fraud, even if not equal to zero minimal. The real problem, says Tom Barker, author of The Medical Malpractice Myth, too much medical malpractice. In fact, research has shown that a majority of cases go unreported. Laws are necessary to protect the interests of patients and medical professionals accountable for their actions.
• "Some medical operations withare not known risks for doctors convicted. "AND" It is not always possible to determine, whether the patient the physician has properly followed the instructions. "
These arguments arise from a misunderstanding of the law. Behandlungsfehler works on the principle of causality, which means that it is not enough to say that the care was substandard or that it does not work. Patients also have a cause-effect relationship between the doctor of the poor showPerformance and an undesirable outcome. This includes the role of an "expert witness", the expert medical testimony. The final decision depends on whether the doctor has something inappropriate that most people would not have done in the medical profession.
Should I file a claim?
Often the patients are on the filing of an action for damages are not sure, because it is difficult to determine whether something has not gone wrong because of bad treatment. If you believe thatincorrect treatment or misdiagnosis is responsible for your bad health, speak to another doctor immediately.
If there is some evidence of medical malpractice, please contact a lawyer immediately, as have all claims, usually a period of one to four years. A qualified solicitor with relevant experience is the best person to guide you through the process of registration of a claim.
Visit : All about dogs in world
0 comments:
Post a Comment